U.S. District Court, Central District of California (Western Division—Los Angeles) Civil Docket for Case #1 2:01 -cv-07293 -MRPAJW.
U.S. States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Opinion, decided Sep. 7, 2005.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit—Opinion, Case No. 01-1038,-1084, Masimo v. Mallinckrodt, Inc. and Nellcor Puritan Bennett, Inc., Decided: Aug. 8, 2001.
United States Courts of Appeals for the Federal Circuit: Mallinckrodt, Inc. v. Masimo Corp., 147 F.App’x 158 (Fed. Cir. 2005).
United States Courts of Appeals for the Federal Circuit:Mallinckrodt, Inc. v. Masimo Corp., 402 F.3d 1364 (Fed. Cir. 2005).
United States Courts of Appeals for the Federal Circuit: Masimo Corp. v. Mallinckrodt, Inc., 18 F App’x.
United States District Court—Civil Minutes, Case No. SA CV 99-1245 AHS (Anx), Masimo v. Mallinckrodt and Nellcor Puritan Bennett, dated Oct. 4, 2000.
Varanini, M., et al., “A Two Channel Adaptive Filtering Approach for Recognition ofthe QRS Morphology”, pp. 141-144, Proceedings of the Computers in Cardiology Meeting, Venice, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Sep. 23-26, 1991.
Viridia CMS 2000 Product Information, Agilent, New SpO2 Algorithm, undated.
W. Byrne, P. Flynn, R. Zapp & M. Siegel, “Adaptive Filter Processing in Microwave Remote Heart Monitors,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. BME-33, No. 7, pp. 717-726, Jul. 1986. Widrow, B., “Adaptive Signal Processing,” Prentice Hall, Englewood, NJ, (1985).
Y. Park, B. Cho, N. Kim, W. Kim S. Park & D.Youn, “A Fetal ECG Signal Monitoring System Using Digital Signal Processor”, ISCAS’88, pp. 2391-2394, 1988.
Yelderman, M., et al. “ECG Enhancement by Adaptive Cancellation of Electrosurgical Interference,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. BME-30 No. 7, Jul. 1983.
Yelderman, M., et al., “Ecg Enhancement by Adaptive Cancellation of Electrosurgical Interference,” pp. 1-21.
Yorky, T., “Multiple Time Samples in Pulse Oximetry,” listing date of Oct. 14, 1992.
Yorky, T., “Signal Processing Technology Development Projects— Fall 92,” listing date ofNov. 5, 1992.
Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff Philips Electronics North
America Corporation Answer to Masimo’s Counterclaims, Masimo
Corporation v. Philips Electronics North America Corporation and
Philips Medizin Systeme Boblingen Gmbh, (District of Delaware,
Case No. 09-00080(JJF)) dated Aug. 3, 2009, pp. 1-23.
Defendants’ Answer and Philips Electronics North America Corpo-
ration’s Amended Counterclaims to Masimo’s First Amended Com-
plaint, Masimo Corporation v. Philips Electronics North America
Corporation and Philips Medizin SystemeBoblingen Gmbh, (District
of Delaware, Case No. 09-00080(JJF)) dated Apr. 21, 2010.
Masimo ’ s Answer to Philips’ Amended Counterclaims, Masimo Cor-
poration v. Philips Electronics North America Corporation and
Philips Medizin Systeme Boblingen GmbH, (District of Delaware,
Case No. 09-00080 (JJF) dated May 10, 2010.
Philips Electronics North America Corporation’s Answer to
Masimo’s Amended Counterclaims, Masimo Corporation v. Philips
Electronics North America Corporation and Philips Medizin
Systeme Boblingen GmbH, (District of Delaware, Case No.
09-00080(JJF)) dated May 27, 2010.
Philips North America Corporation and Philips Medizin Systeme
Boblingen GmbH’s Seventh Supplemental Objections and
Responses to Masimo Corporation’s First Set of Interrogatories (No.
1-8), Masimo Corporation v. Philips Electronics North America
Corporation and Philips Medizin Systeme Boblingen GmbH, (Dis-
trict of Delaware, Case No. 09-00080(JJF)) dated Jun. 30, 2010
(Redacted).
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 09/111,604, filed Jul. 7, 1998.
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 07/666,060, filed on Mar. 7, 1991.
U.S. Appl. No. 07/666,060, filed Mar 7, 1991.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/110,542, filed Jul. 6, 1998.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/111,604, filed Jul. 7, 1998.
Patently ObviousTM, Intellectual Property Analysis of Masimo Inc.
Patent Holdings, Masimo Corporation v. philips Electronics North
America Corporation, et al. issued on Nov. 4, 2010 via email in 9
pages.
Report and Recommendation re Claim Construction, MASIMO Cor-
poration v. Philips Electronics North America Corporation and
Philips Medizin Systeme Boblingen GmbH, (District of Delaware,
Case No. 1:09-cv-00080 (LPS/MPT) dated Feb. 18, 2011.
